| Date: | Tuesday, June 16, 2026 1:00 PM EST |
|---|---|
| Length: | 60 Minutes |
| Expert: | Mark R. Brengelman |
| Event Type: | Live Webinar |
| Days Left: | 19 Days Left |
HIPAA 42 CFR Part 2 – new updates about the Confidentiality of Substance Use Disorder (SUD) Patient Records: What You Need to Know
42 CFR Part 2 Final Rule: What You Need to Know
On February 8, 2024, both the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) with the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) along with the Office for Civil Rights announced a final rule in the Code of Federal Regulations changing the HIPAA confidentiality of medical and mental health records for Substance Use Disorder (SUD) records regulations.
The implementation date of February 16, 2026, has come and gone with a compliance deadline creating immediate enforcement exposure.
This new law is now at 42 CFR part 2. With this final rule now firmly in place, the HHS is implementing the confidentiality provisions originating with section 3221 of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, which was enacted March 27, 2020, and which require the Department to align certain aspects of Part 2 with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) Rules and other applicable federal law in the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH).
The Part 2 statute (42 U.S.C. 290dd-2) protects the following: “[r]ecords of the identity, diagnosis, prognosis, or treatment of any patient which are maintained in connection with the performance of any program or activity relating to substance use disorder education, prevention, training, treatment, rehabilitation, or research, which is conducted, regulated, or directly or indirectly assisted by any department or agency of the United States.”
These defined confidentiality protections now help address concerns that discrimination and fear of criminal prosecution deter people from entering treatment for SUD.
The updates, changes, and modifications in this final rule reflect the proposals published in the December 2, 2022, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) and public comments received from many interested parties.
These included substance use disorder and other advocacy groups; trade and professional associations; behavioral and other health providers; health information technology vendors and health information exchanges; state, local, tribal and territorial governments; health plans; academic institutions, including academic health centers; and unaffiliated or anonymous individuals.
Following the usual and customary 60-day comment period, HHS analyzed and carefully considered all comments submitted from the public on the NPRM and made appropriate modifications before finalizing this updated law. This is an intermediate webinar.
Areas Covered in the Session:-
The areas covered in this session include these learning objectives:
Background:-
HIPAA medical records confidentiality and confidentiality of substance use disorder; mental health records confidentiality.
Why Should You Attend?
This webinar examines the new Code of Federal Regulations governing HIPAA privacy for Substance Use Disorder records in mental health.
This new federal law is only a few months old, but has had a huge impact on the rights of patients and persons availing themselves of mental health treatment for substance use disorder.
Erase the uncertainty and doubt about what the new law does – and doesn’t – do to protect patient confidentiality.
Who will Benefit?
Mark R. Brengelman became interested in law when he graduated with both Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees in Philosophy from Emory University in Atlanta. He earned a Juris Doctorate from the University of Kentucky College of Law. Mark became an Assistant Attorney General in Kentucky in the area of administrative and professional law as the assigned counsel and prosecuting attorney to numerous health professions licensure boards.
He retired from the state government, became certified as a hearing officer, and opened his own law practice, including working as a legislative agent (lobbyist).
As a frequent participant in continuing education, Mark has been a presenter for over thirty national and state organizations and private companies as the:
Kentucky Bar Association
Kentucky Office of the Attorney General
National Attorneys General Training and Research Institute, and
Federation of Associations of Regulatory Boards.
This also includes multiple, national healthcare organizations, including:
Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards
Federation of State Boards of Physical Therapy
National Council of State Boards of Nursing
National Association of State Emergency Medical Services Officials
National Association of State Contractors Licensing Agencies, and
American Association of Veterinary State Boards
Mark was the founding presenter for “Navigating Ethics and Law for Mental Health Professionals,” a continuing education training approved by five Kentucky mental health licensure boards. He also founded “The Kentucky Code of Ethical Conduct: Ethical Practice; Risk Management, and; the Code of Ethical Conduct” as an approved, state-mandated continuing education for social workers offered as a video-on-demand.
Mark has now worked for all three branches of state government has worked since June 2018 as the Enforcement Counsel for the Kentucky Legislative Ethics Commission, an independent regulatory body that oversees 138 elected state legislators and nearly 800 registered lobbyists. Continuing as an ethics attorney, Mark is also the contract counsel for the Ethics Commission of the Louisville Metro Government, a city and county merged government, the largest city in Kentucky, and the 45th largest metropolitan statistical area in the United States.
Mark focuses on representing health care practitioners before licensure boards and in other professional regulatory matters and representing children as Guardian ad Litem and parents as Court Appointed Counsel in confidential child dependency, neglect, and abuse proceedings and termination of parental rights proceedings in family court.